Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatrics

An Interactive Guide for Health Professionals

What is Mechanical Ventilation (VM)?

Mechanical Ventilation (MV) is a life support strategy which uses a machine (ventilator) to help a patient breathe or to breathe completely for them.

It is not a curative therapy, but a bridge which maintains respiratory function while the underlying cause of respiratory failure is treated and the body recovers.

Main Objectives of the VM:

  • Improve gas exchange: Correct hypoxemia (low oxygenation) and hypercapnia (excess CO₂).
  • Reduce work of breathing: Reduce the effort made by the respiratory muscles, avoiding fatigue.
  • Allow sedation and patient management: Facilitates procedures and comfort in critical patients.
  • Protect the airway: In patients with a low level of consciousness, avoid aspirations.
Control Point: Key Concept

The VM is a measure of medium, not a cure. Its purpose is to give the body time to heal. Is this fundamental concept clear?

Why and When to Start the VM?

The decision to start MV is based on the clinical evaluation of respiratory failure, which is the inability of the respiratory system to maintain adequate gas exchange. It is classified into:

Respiratory Failure Type I (Hypoxemic)

Failure in oxygenation. PaO₂ < 60 mmHg with FiO₂ ≥ 60%.

Common causes: Pneumonia, ARDS, pulmonary edema.

Type II Respiratory Failure (Hypercapnic)

Ventilation failure. PaCO₂ > 50 mmHg with pH < 7.35.

Common causes: Severe asthma, neuromuscular disease, CNS depression.

Clinical Indications to Start VM:

  • Apnea or agonal breathing: Cessation of breathing or ineffective gasping.
  • Increased work of breathing: Severe tachypnea, retractions (drawing), nasal flaring, moaning, use of accessory muscles. Signs of impending fatigue.
  • Oxygenation failure: Persistent hypoxemia despite high-flow oxygen therapy.
  • Ventilation failure: Progressive hypercapnia with respiratory acidosis.
  • Airway protection: Patients with GCS ≤ 8 or inability to manage secretions.
  • Hemodynamic compromise: Shock requiring deep sedation and reduction in oxygen consumption.
Checkpoint: The Key Decision

The decision to intubate is not based on a single number, but on the clinical trend and the evaluation of respiratory work. Do you identify signs of muscle exhaustion as a critical indication?

Ventilatory Types and Modes

There are two main types of VM depending on access to the airway and multiple modes depending on how the ventilator delivers support.

Invasive vs. Non-invasive

Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV)

Support through a mask (nasal, facial) or nasal cannulas. The patient must have his own respiratory drive.

Ideal for: Cardiogenic pulmonary edema, mild-moderate asthma attacks, exacerbated COPD.

Invasive Ventilation (IMV)

Support through an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy. Allows total control of the airway and ventilation.

Indicated in: Severe respiratory failure, NIV failure, airway protection.

Common Ventilator Modes in Pediatrics

The ventilatory mode defines the relationship between the patient and the ventilator. The most common modes are:

Mode Control Variable Description Pediatric Advantages Disadvantages
PCV (Pressure Controlled Vent) Pressure An inspiratory pressure is set. The volume delivered is variable and depends on lung mechanics. Protects against barotrauma, better gas distribution in non-homogeneous lungs. Ideal for neonates and infants with leaks through the tube. Tidal volume is not guaranteed, risk of hypoventilation if compliance worsens.
VCV (Volume Controlled Vent) Volume A tidal volume is set. The pressure is variable. It guarantees a stable minute volume, useful in older children and in pathologies where CO₂ control is crucial (e.g. TBI). Risk of barotrauma if compliance decreases or resistance increases.
PSV (Pressure Support Vent) Flow Spontaneous mode. The patient initiates breathing and the ventilator supports it with a fixed pressure until the patient's inspiratory flow declines. Improves comfort, reduces respiratory work and facilitates weaning. Requires a patient with reliable respiratory drive. It does not guarantee volume or frequency.
SIMV (Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation) Volume or Pressure It combines mandatory (controlled) breaths with periods where the patient can breathe spontaneously. Allows the patient to exercise the respiratory muscles between controlled cycles. Theoretically it makes weaning easier. May increase work of breathing. Deprecated as a primary mode, surpassed by PCV/VCV + PSV combinations.
Control Point: Pressure vs. Volume

In pediatrics, especially in infants, the mode is often preferred. pressure controlled (PCV). Can you explain why protection against excessive pressure (barotrauma) and leak management are key in this age group?

Initial Parameters in Pediatric VM

The initial programming of the ventilator must be safe and adapted to the age and pathology of the child. Here is a general guide. Always individualize!

Parameter Neonate (<1 month) Infant (1m - 2a) Child (2nd - 12th) Adolescent (>12a) Physiological Objective
Mode PCV (+PSV if breathing) PCV or VCV (+ PSV if breathing) Protect lung, synchrony
FiO₂ Start with 100%, lower rapidly to SatO₂ >92% (or 88-92% in some heart diseases) Correct hypoxemia, avoid toxicity
VT (Tidal Volume) If VCV is used: 6-8ml/kg ideal weight. In ARDS: 4-6ml/kg. Adequate ventilation, avoid volutrauma
PIP / P. Control 18-25 cmH₂O 20-28 cmH₂O 22-30 cmH₂O 25-30 cmH₂O Achieve desired VT, avoid barotrauma
PEEP 4-6 cmH₂O 5-8 cmH₂O (may be higher in ARDS) Prevent alveolar collapse, improve oxygenation
FR (Response Frequency) 30-50rpm 25-40rpm 20-30rpm 12-20rpm Maintain normal PaCO₂ for age
You (T. Insp.) 0.3-0.5s 0.5-0.8s 0.8-1.0s 1.0-1.2s Allow alveolar filling and emptying

Interactive Chart: Frequency vs. Age

Normal respiratory rate decreases dramatically with age. Observe the trend in this graph.

Control Point: Protective Ventilation

The key concept is lung protective ventilation: Use the lowest possible volume/pressure and FiO₂ to achieve acceptable goals (SatO₂ >92%, normal or permissive PaCO₂). Do you understand that "normalizing" gases at all costs can damage the lung?

Parameter Monitoring and Adjustment

Once the VM is started, the key is to monitor and tune. The goal is to find the "sweet spot" where support is effective and damage minimal.

What to monitor?

  • Clinic: Thoracic expansion, coloration, perfusion, patient-ventilator synchrony.
  • Basic monitoring: SatO₂, ETCO₂ (capnography), FC, TA.
  • Blood gases (arterial/venous): The "gold standard" to evaluate oxygenation (PaO₂) and ventilation (PaCO₂).
  • Fan mechanics: Pressures (peak, plateau), volumes, flow and pressure curves.

How to adjust the parameters?

To correct HYPOXEMIA (low SatO₂ / PaO₂)

1. Increase FiO₂: It is the fastest measure. Objective: use the lowest FiO₂ possible (<60%) to maintain SatO₂ >92%.

2. Increase PEEP (Mean Airway Pressure): The most important step to improve oxygenation in diseased lungs. Recruits collapsed alveoli, improving the V/Q ratio. Increase in steps of 1-2 cmH₂O. Monitor hypotension!

To correct HYPERCAPNIA (high PaCO₂, low pH)

Reminder: Minute Volume (MV) = Respiratory Rate (RR) x Tidal Volume (VT). To "wash" CO₂, you have to increase the VM.

1. Increase Respiratory Rate (RR): It is the simplest way. Be careful not to generate auto-PEEP by shortening the expiratory time too much.

2. Increase Tidal Volume (VT): In VCV mode, increase ml/kg (without exceeding 8 ml/kg). In PCV mode, increase the inspiratory pressure (PIP or P. Control). Monitor baro/volutrauma!

To correct HYPOCAPNIA (low PaCO₂, high pH)

Indicates overventilation. It is corrected by doing the opposite:

1. Decrease Respiratory Rate (RR).

2. Decrease Tidal Volume (VT) or Inspiratory Pressure.

Control Point: Oxygenation vs. Ventilation

It is vital to differentiate: FiO₂ and PEEP they manage the oxygenation. FR and VT they manage the ventilation (CO₂). If a patient has low SatO₂ but normal CO₂, which parameter would you adjust first?

The Weaning Process

The goal is to release the patient from the ventilator as soon as possible to avoid complications. Weaning must be an active and protocolized process.

Criteria to Start Weaning:

  • Resolution (or clear improvement) of the underlying cause.
  • Hemodynamic stability: without the need for high doses of vasopressors.
  • Adequate oxygenation with minimal support: FiO₂ ≤ 40-50% and PEEP ≤ 5-8 cmH₂O.
  • Patient awake, cooperative and with airway reflexes present (cough, swallowing).
  • Adequate respiratory drive.

Spontaneous Breathing Test (PRE or SBT)

It is the method of choice to evaluate whether the patient is ready for extubation. It consists of simulating post-extubation breathing conditions while still intubated.

How is a PRE performed?

The ventilatory mode is changed to minimal support for 30-120 minutes:

  • Low Pressure Support (PSV): PEEP of 5 cmH₂O and a PS of 5-7 cmH₂O (to compensate for tube resistance).
  • T-tube: Connect the endotracheal tube to a humidified oxygen source without pressure support.

PRE Failure Criteria (Indicate that it is not ready):

  • Increased work of breathing: Tachypnea (>50% of baseline), indrawing, agitation.
  • Impaired gas exchange: SatO₂ < 90% or increase in FiO₂ requirement.
  • Hemodynamic instability: Tachycardia or bradycardia (>20% of baseline), hypotension.
  • Changes in mental status: Agitation, drowsiness.

If the PRE is successful, we proceed to extubation.

Checkpoint: Ready to fly solo?

The PRE is the "final examination" of the patient before extubation. A failure is not an error, it is valuable information that indicates that the patient needs more support time. Do you understand that the goal is safe extubation, not rapid extubation?

Practical Examples (Clinical Cases)

Case 1: 3-month-old infant with Severe Bronchiolitis

Clinic: Infant with severe tachypnea (RR 80 rpm), universal indrawing, nasal flaring and apnea pauses. SatO₂ 85% with high flow cannula. Gasometry: pH 7.25, pCO₂ 65, pO₂ 55.

Decision: Intubation due to respiratory exhaustion and mixed respiratory failure.

Initial parameters (Weight 5 kg):

  • Mode: PCV (Pressure Control).
  • PIP: 22 cmH₂O (looking for VT 6-8 ml/kg, i.e. 30-40 ml).
  • PEEP: 6 cmH₂O (to counteract the collapse of the small airway).
  • FR: 35 rpm.
  • You: 0.5s.
  • FiO₂: 60% (to start, going down according to SatO₂).

Reasoning: PCV is chosen due to the high resistance of the airway (typical of bronchiolitis) and to limit pressure. PEEP is crucial. The RR is high, according to his age.

Case 2: 8-year-old boy with Asthmatic Status

Clinic: Child with severe bronchospasm, silent, drowsy chest. Gasometry: pH 7.18, pCO₂ 80. Despite intensive treatment, there is no improvement.

Decision: Intubation due to severe hypercapnia and altered level of consciousness.

Initial parameters (Weight 25 kg):

  • Mode: VCV or PCV. Objective: allow long expiratory time.
  • Strategy: Permissive hypercapnia.
  • VT: 6 ml/kg (150 ml).
  • PEEP: 5 cmH₂O (low PEEP so as not to increase air trapping).
  • FR: 16-18 rpm (low for your age, to maximize expiratory time).
  • You: 0.8 s (for an I:E ratio of 1:3 or 1:4).
  • FiO₂: 100% initial, download soon.

Reasoning: The key in asthma is to avoid air trapping (auto-PEEP). This is achieved with a low RR and a long expiratory time. A high pCO₂ is tolerated (permissive hypercapnia) as long as the pH > 7.20-7.25 so as not to increase barotrauma.

Case 3: 15-year-old adolescent with ARDS due to Sepsis

Clinic: Patient with septic shock, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates. PaO₂/FiO₂ (PAFI) < 150. Refractory hypoxemia.

Decision: VM for moderate-severe ARDS.

Initial parameters (Ideal weight 60 kg):

  • Strategy: Lung protective ventilation.
  • Mode: PCV or VCV.
  • VT: 4-6 ml/kg (240-360 ml). Low volume!
  • PEEP: 10-15 cmH₂O (high PEEP to recruit alveoli).
  • FR: 20-25 rpm (can be high to compensate for low VT and control pCO₂).
  • Objective of P. plateau: < 30 cmH₂O.
  • FiO₂: The necessary for SatO₂ 88-95%.

Reasoning: The management of ARDS is based on minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). This implies low VT (protection against volutrauma) and optimal PEEP (protection against atelectrauma), tolerating moderate hypercapnia.

Case 4: Postoperative Cardiac Surgery

Clinic: 5-year-old boy stable after correction of a VSD. He is transferred to the ICU intubated.

Decision: Maintain VM for a smooth transition and postoperative control.

Initial parameters (Weight 18 kg):

  • Mode: SIMV-PC + PS.
  • Q. Control: 15-18 cmH₂O over PEEP.
  • PEEP: 5 cmH₂O.
  • FR: 20 rpm (backup rate).
  • PS: 8-10 cmH₂O over PEEP.
  • FiO₂: 40%.

Reasoning: The lung is usually healthy. The goal is gentle support that allows the child to wake up and begin breathing on his or her own. SIMV or PCV+PS mode allows this transition. Weaning is usually quick if there are no complications.

Case 5: 10-year-old boy with Neuromuscular Disease

Clinic: Patient with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy admitted for pneumonia. He presents a weak cough, accumulation of secretions and progressive hypercapnia (pCO₂ 68) with good oxygenation.

Decision: Initiate ventilatory support due to muscle pump failure (Responsive Insufficiency Type II).

Choice: Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) with a face mask is tried first.

NIV parameters:

  • Mode: S/T (Spontaneous/Timed).
  • IPAP (Inspiratory Pressure): 12 cmH₂O.
  • EPAP (Expiratory Pressure, PEEP): 5 cmH₂O.
  • Backup FR: 16 rpm.
  • FiO₂: 25% (oxygenation is not the main problem).

Reasoning: The lung is healthy, the problem is the weakness of the respiratory muscles. NIV can be very effective in "resting" these muscles, improving ventilation, and helping to remove secretions. If NIV fails or the patient does not tolerate it, intubation would proceed.

Knowledge Assessment

Test what you learned. Select the answer you think is correct and then click "Check" to get the feedback.

Bibliographic References

  • Kneyber, M. C. J., de Luca, D., Calderini, E., Jarreau, P. H., Javouhey, E., Lopez-Herce, J., ... & Rimensberger, P. C. (2017). Recommendations for mechanical ventilation of critically ill children from the Pediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC). Intensive care medicine, 43(12), 1764-1778.
  • Santschi, M., Jouvet, P., Leclerc, F., Gauvin, F., Newth, C. J., Carroll, C. L., ... & Lacroix, J. (2016). Acute lung injury in children: therapeutic practice and feasibility of international clinical trials. Pediatric critical care medicine, 17(1), 1-9.
  • Faria, I. M., Garcia, P. C. R., Piva, J. P., & Einloft, P. R. (2020). Mechanical ventilation in children. In J. P. Piva & P. ​​C. R. Garcia (Eds.), Intensive Medicine in Pediatrics (3rd ed.). Revinter.
  • Slutsky, A. S., & Ranieri, V. M. (2013). Ventilator-induced lung injury. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(22), 2126-2136.
  • MacIntyre, N. R. (2011). Evidence-based ventilator weaning and discontinuation. Respiratory care, 56(11), 1751-1763.
  • American Heart Association. (2020). Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) Provider Manual.